|

The opportunities for ‘smarter’ advertising on digital TV

The opportunities for ‘smarter’ advertising on digital TV

Ipsos logo

The latest research piece from Ipsos MediaCT looks at advertising opportunities on digital TV.

As the UK digital switchover continues to gather pace, September 2009 saw the landmark one-millionth home switched to digital-only TV services. Ofcom has reported that 23 million UK homes (90%) now access digital television at home, while 7 in 10 of all (primary and secondary) television sets are digitally enabled (1).

The popularity and accessibility of Freeview has been a key driver in the growth of digital TV ownership and has enabled large sections of the population to access digital television for a one-off fee. The successful launch of Freesat in May 2008 has now boosted free-to-view digital TV ownership to 40% of all UK households (1).

Despite the current economic climate, it is also evident that many households continue to be prepared to pay for digital television. Currently half of all homes in the UK subscribe to either cable or satellite services, while the average monthly bill among this group is £33.60 (2), by far exceeding that of a basic paid-for TV package. 58% of Sky subscribers have upgraded to Sky+, while a sixth have Sky HD (1). Against a backdrop of diminishing expendable income for many, it is often argued that consumers increasingly turn to their televisions as a lower-cost alternative to outdoor leisure activities and, consequently, many are prepared to invest in their TV viewing experience.

Despite the current success of digital television, new figures released by the IAB, PwC and WARC indicate that internet ad spend has overtaken TV for the first time, making online the UK’s biggest advertising medium. While this eventuality was seen by many as a foregone conclusion, it has come a year earlier than predicted and represents a blow to the TV industry. In addition, the television industry has also come up against increasing ad avoidance, brought on by more wide-spread ownership of PVRs.

Amidst this increasingly competitive and complex market, it is therefore imperative that TV operators can continue to respond, by offering engaging and ultimately more effective means of facilitating communication between advertisers and consumers.

In April 2009, Sky launched its green button innovation, enabling advertisers to further engage with consumers by offering additional ad features on demand. However, perhaps the most exciting development in TV advertising at this time is the progress currently being made in the provision of targeted and tailored ad systems. Last week, Sky announced plans to launch AdSmart, a behavioural targeting tool for TV audiences. Initially, AdSmart will be launched online via SkyPlayer, however plans are in place to roll-out the system on digital TV, through Sky HD boxes, in early 2011.

It is widely accepted that advertising is most effective and more preferential to consumers when it is relevant to them and their needs. While television advertising is extremely effective and far-reaching, it is often accused of being inefficient, reaching vast numbers who have no interest in the products or services featured, while targeting those who do. Behavioural targeting will help to ensure television advertising is more likely to be relevant to those who consume it. Behaviour will be tracked (eg through a set-top box) and combined with demographic and potentially attitudinal data (eg obtained through subscription agreements and surveys). This information will then be used to match campaigns to their specific profile and direct tailored advertising to their household. In this way, brand owners will have much greater confidence that their advertising is being viewed by those most likely to be interested in their product.

Of course, behavioural targeting of advertising is not new and is commonly utilised by online advertisers to increase the efficiency of campaigns. However, the introduction of such a system to the medium of television and the prospect that people watching the same programme at the same time, but in different households, will receive totally different brand communications depending on their demographics and tracked behaviour, is undoubtedly a revolutionary concept. It is also one that further highlights the power of digital TV, in comparison to its analogue predecessor, and arguably the ability of digital TV to keep pace with the internet as an advertising platform.

The prospective launch of tailored TV advertising brings with it a plethora of opportunities, as well as an element of uncertainty, not least for TV audiences. Referring back to online advertising, the infamous ‘Phorm storm’ has highlighted the important issues surrounding ethics and the protection of privacy when tracking behaviour and sharing data with advertisers. Research conducted in the US has also highlighted that inhibitions of audiences may also prove a barrier to effective tailored advertising; 66% of American internet users do not want marketers to tailor advertising to this interest and this proportion increases once they are informed of how such tailoring would be achieved (3). However, by joining the movement towards tailored advertising at a later stage, the TV industry finds itself in a favourable position for acting upon the previous learnings of its online competitor.

The future, spurred on by the growth of digital TV, is an exciting and multi-faceted one. Of particular interest to Ipsos MediaCT is the challenge of adapting to such changes in the market place, from a research point of view. It is essential to embrace this challenge and mirror the creative drive of TV platform operators, in devising innovative and effective ways of accurately researching the effectiveness of these new advertising tools, in order to continue assisting brand owners and advertisers in successfully communicating with consumers and maximising ROI.

(1) Ofcom Digital Television Update, Q2 2009

(2) Ofcom Technology Tracker, Q1 2009

(3) ‘Contrary to what marketers say, Americans reject tailored advertising’. Universities of Pennsylvania and Berkeley, 2009

Media Jobs