Affluent Americans are the fastest growing income group online says a new report from Nielsen//NetRatings.
The lower income groups also experienced growth, with the lowest salary band growing faster than middle earning’s. The $0-25,000 group grew by 18% while the $50-75,000 managed an increase of only 11%.
However, as the table below shows, the income group $150,000+ represents only 7.8 million users, a small number when compared to the overall total of nearly 142 million. Although the middle income bands appear to have the slowest growth rate, they do infact have the largest number of internet users with 42.4 million in the $50-75,000 band and 37.8 million earning $25,000-£50,000.
Year-Over-Year Internet Access Growth By Income Level (US, Home) | ||||
Unique Audience (000) | ||||
Income Level | March 2003 | March 2004 | Yearly Percent Growth (%) | |
$150,000+ | 6,010 | 7,873 | 31 | |
$75,000 – 99,999 | 20,732 | 26,393 | 27 | |
$100,000 – 149,999 | 14,356 | 17,786 | 24 | |
$0 – 24,999 | 7,961 | 9,399 | 18 | |
$25,000 – 49,999 | 33,074 | 37,826 | 14 | |
$50,000 – 74,999 | 38,165 | 42,473 | 11 | |
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, April 2004 |
The report also shows that internet users with higher income’s prefer high-speed access. Those earning $150,000+ make up 69% of total broadband users.
On the other hand, nearly two-third of those with earnings between $25-50,000 log-on using narrowband, with just 36% using broadband. In the lowest salary band of $0-25,000 only 25% access via a high-speed connection.
Broadband vs Narrowband By Household Income (US, Home) | ||||
Income Level | Narrowband | Broadband | ||
$150,000+ | 31 | 69 | ||
$100,000 – 149,999 | 39 | 61 | ||
$75,000 – $99,999 | 50 | 50 | ||
$50,000 – 74,999 | 54 | 46 | ||
$25,000 – 49,999 | 64 | 36 | ||
$0 – 24,999 | 75 | 25 | ||
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, April 2004 |
Kenneth Cassar, director of strategic analysis said: “Cost plays a tremendous part in internet access patterns. While broadband has become much less expensive, it’s still a significant cost as compared to narrowband. Tighter budgets simply would not be able to afford the luxury of having broadband.”