| |

Facebook scandal: Broadcasters could be ‘big winners’

Facebook scandal: Broadcasters could be ‘big winners’

As Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica data breach scandal deepens, analysts have suggested the free-to-air (FTA) broadcasters could see healthy returns as advertisers are dissuaded from switching money out of TV.

Cambridge Analytica, the firm that helped Donald Trump get elected, amassed data on 50 million Facebook users without their permission, sending Facebook’s market value down nearly $50 billion since Friday, according to FactSet.

However, analysts suggest the debacle is good news for broadcasters such as Channel 4 and ITV as advertiser views about the medium’s “resilience” are cemented.

“We think the big winners could be the FTA broadcasters in two ways,” said Liberum’s Ian Whittaker and Annick Maas on Wednesday.

“Firstly, the increasing problems with online are, at the very least, likely to dissuade advertisers from aggressively switching money out of TV advertising into online. Comments from several broadcasters suggest that some money is already flowing back into TV from online from advertisers who are becoming more convinced by TV’s resilience.”

The analysts also said the scandal presents a “very significant opportunity” for broadcasters to monetise their video on demand (VOD) advertising services, which are “very high margin” and which do not suffer from the same issues as the online platforms in terms of viewability.

“We see these additional revenues as the main generator of ITV’s profit growth in the future,” they said.
[advert position=”left”]
Alongside broadcasters, the analysts also believe the scandal – coupled with wider concerns over online brand safety and viewability – is “positive” for agencies.

“The news…weakens dramatically the argument that clients should disintermediate the agencies and go directly to the big online platforms,” they said.

“Advertisers, we feel, are increasingly unlikely to take that risk. There is an argument that, if the controversy leads to less people providing their data willingly, that this could undermine the agencies’ attempts to monetise data, just as an oil company cannot survive without oil, how can a data company survive without data.”

However, if advertisers do take more control of their data, then the agencies would be in a better position to work with them to more effectively monetise it.

“It would create more demand for the agencies’ services,” they said.

MarkDavies, Managing Director, Whistl, on 26 Mar 2018
“I would agree that this issue and the litany of other concerns raised by advertisers recently - viewability, measurement, brand reputation and most importantly performance - will drive investment out of digital marketing but I never understand why TV is seen as the only alternative source for these budgets. All traditional media should be the beneficiaries of this rebalancing as all have something to offer. I know it is still for reasons unfathomable deeply unfashionable to imagine that direct marketing will bounce back - when did provable performance, solid ROI and compelling Lifetime Value metrics become so untrendy? - but this is the year it will happen. Scandals about data transparency will have a new, profounder resonance for clients after GDPR comes into effect in May this year and the new e-privacy directive will continue that trajectory into 2019. Overlooked channels like doordrop media which is GDPR-compliant by design and capable of balancing marketing effectiveness and reach for customer acquisition better than any other will be suddenly in vogue again. Albeit an under the radar sort of vogue as I'm sure people will still be loathe to talk about it. Of course buried deep beneath the headlines it already is happening. 43% growth in doordrop volumes in the past two years is not driven by some retrospective ache for a simpler time but purely a matter of numbers. And for a channel that has always preferred to be rich than famous, that'll be just fine!”

Media Jobs